For a limited time, the site was maintained as an online resource for the best known
upper bounds for these classes of binary block codes. It is kept for historical reasons but not updated any longer. Many entries have been improved in more recent publications than the ones cited here.
Links
Related tables of bounds for various classes of codes are maintained on the following sites.
[B]
A. E. Brouwer: Upper and lower bounds for unrestricted
binary,
ternary, and quaternary codes.
The tables constitute online versions of [4] and are regularly updated (2014).
[G]
M. Grassl: Code Tables—Bounds on the parameters of various types of codes
[J]
D. B. Jaffe: Upper and lower bounds for binary linear codes.
[LRS]
S. Litsyn, E. M. Rains, and N. J. A. Sloane: Extensive tables of lower bounds for unrestricted binary codes.
This is an online version of [6], updated until 1999.
[RS]
E. M. Rains, and N. J. A. Sloane: Lower bounds for constant-weight binary codes, with upper bounds where they are known to coincide with the lower bounds. These tables, which unfortunately do not seem to be online anymore (2014), were an electronic supplement to [5].
References
[1]
E. Agrell, A. Vardy, and K. Zeger,
“Upper bounds for constant-weight codes,”
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 46, no. 7, pp. 2373–2395, Nov. 2000.
[2]
E. Agrell, A. Vardy, and K. Zeger,
“A table of upper bounds for binary codes,”
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 47, no. 7, pp. 3004–3006, Nov. 2001.
Correction
[3] M. R. Best, A. E. Brouwer, F. J. MacWilliams, A. M. Odlyzko,
and N. J. A. Sloane,
“Bounds for binary codes of length less than 25,”
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. IT-24, no. 1, pp. 81–93, January 1978.
[4] A. E. Brouwer,
“Bounds on the size of linear codes,”
in Handbook of Coding Theory
(V. S. Pless and W. C. Huffman, eds.),
vol. 1, pp. 295–461, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1998.
[5] A. E. Brouwer, J. B. Shearer, N. J. A. Sloane, and W. D. Smith,
“A new table of constant weight codes,”
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 36, no. 6, pp. 1334–1380, Nov. 1990.
[6] S. Litsyn,
“An updated table of the best binary codes known,”
in Handbook of Coding Theory
(V. S. Pless and W. C. Huffman, eds.),
vol. 1, pp. 463–498, Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier, 1998.
[7] B. Mounits, T. Etzion, and S. Litsyn,
“Improved upper bounds on sizes of codes,”
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 880–886, Apr. 2002.
[8] A. Schrijver,
“New code upper bounds from the Terwilliger algebra and semidefinite programming”,
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 2859–2866, Aug. 2005.
[9] D. Smith, A. Sakhnovich, S. Perkins, D. Knight, and L. Hughes,
“Application of coding theory to the design of frequency hopping lists,”
Tech. report UG-M-02-1, Div. of Math. and Stat.,
Univ. of Glamorgan, Wales, U.K., Feb. 2002.
[10] P. R. J. Östergård,
“Classification of binary constant weight codes”,
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 56, no. 8, pp. 3779–3785, Aug. 2010.
[11] P. R. J. Östergård,
“On the size of optimal three-error-correcting binary codes of length 16”,
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 6824–6826, Oct. 2011.
[12] D. C. Gijswijt, H. D. Mittelmann, and A. Schrijver,
“Semidefinite code bounds based on quadruple distances”,
IEEE Transactions on Information Theory,
vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 2697–2705, May 2012.
Contact
Erik Agrell
agrell@chalmers.se